| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Matrix Skye
Caldari
   |
Posted - 2008.07.18 17:20:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Matrix Skye on 18/07/2008 17:23:33
 Originally by: InSession
Originally by: PinkyPie
hey guys next time i will politely ask my target to sit there for half an hour and take the beating till we can finish the job
Oh come on, he was 5% structure when he killed himself. Two Vagabonds aren't DPS monsters you know.
if you choose to nano your ship and gimp your dps then your target should bend over so you can finish the job?
let's see would you not nano away if your targets got points on you and they gain dps on you? No? I didn't think so.
earn your kills FFS, and stop acting like a whining brat.
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.18 17:53:00 -
[2]
Originally by: border haulin
Originally by: Matrix Skye
Edited by: Matrix Skye on 18/07/2008 17:23:33
Originally by: InSession
Originally by: PinkyPie
hey guys next time i will politely ask my target to sit there for half an hour and take the beating till we can finish the job
Oh come on, he was 5% structure when he killed himself. Two Vagabonds aren't DPS monsters you know.
if you choose to nano your ship and gimp your dps then your target should bend over so you can finish the job?
let's see would you not nano away if your targets got points on you and they gain dps on you? No? I didn't think so.
earn your kills FFS, and stop acting like a whining brat.
Die like a man!
Like in a war or a real sword fight? oh no, you meant in an internet spaceships game
here it is again: INTERNET SPACESHIP GAMES DO NOT MAKE YOUR P3NUS GROW! it doesn't matter what you've heard from your friends in grade school
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.18 18:15:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Matrix Skye on 18/07/2008 18:18:28
Originally by: border haulin
Wait! What did you say? You make no since of the common nature.What makes you think I really care?  Seems you care more about your size than me
Wait what? no you say since nature what you size common for me makes U!
Do you lack cells in your brain or something?
Read what you wrote and what you quoted from me as many times as you need until it makes some sense (<=== SENSE, not since). K?
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.18 18:38:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Matrix Skye on 18/07/2008 18:39:12
Had to fix your post but...
Originally by: InSession
Also to the selfdestruct-whiners. Try taking on a fleet of nanos, then talk. Only way for a non-nano ship like mine to have the final say is to self-destruct and watch the babies ***** in local. It's called feeding on pirate tears.
Yes. I agree.
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 13:03:00 -
[5]
Originally by: techzer0
Originally by: Matrix Skye
if you choose to nano your ship and gimp your dps then your target should bend over so you can finish the job?
let's see would you not nano away if your targets got points on you and they gain dps on you? No? I didn't think so.
earn your kills FFS, and stop acting like a whining brat.
In this post: Someone who has never flown a vagabond.
Only way to get DPS out of a vaga is nano'd (Lorzion was in my Vaga, and it has two Gyros in the lows)
then you nano huggers need to get your stories straight.
1 when it suits you, you say nano'd ships have gimped dps.
2 when it suits you, you say nano'd ships enchance their dps
i guess today you'll use excuse #2
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 13:37:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
Matrix, honest question, have you ever flown a vagabond?
no. and now i'd like to ask you an honest question:
why is it you nano huggers say vagas have shit dps when nano'd but in this thread you admit they have in fact better dps when nano'd?
is it a coincidence that it suits you here to admit nanos have good dps? your turn to answer :)
|
Matrix Skye
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.22 13:48:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
I dislike how you think of nano supporters as one collective group, so I personally can't answer for whoever said that vagabonds have good DPS.
i'm happy to shed some light on this question for you. tech0 said it a couple of posts above mine.
Quote:
I think their DPS is subpar when compared to the DPS of other HACs such as the sacri and the ishtar.
i'm not arguing whether nanos have subpar dps compared to other hacs or not (especially against other nano HAC's, such as the ishtar). my point is nanos for the most part control the choice to engage AND disengage. There are few ships that can dictate otherwise that don't require blobs.
Quote:
For example, vagabonds only deal (with my fairly decent skills) 279 DPS at 15km Proof
thx for the proof, but this isn't what i'm arguing about. see above.
Quote:
And I'm not sure what your point is, I very much doubt that anyone would say that vagabonds have good DPS. Having read techzer's post, I'm pretty sure he meant that the only way you could survive long enough to get DPS out of a vaga is by nanoing it, but I agree that the wording is somewhat peculiar.
again, vagas and other nanos have minimal risks compared to shield/armor tankers. at the moment they stand at the top of choices when it comes to pvp. they can dish out dps (maybe not the greatest, but still) when needed, and haul ass when shit hits the fan. you shouldn't have a "run for free" card whenever things go south for you. it's about committing to the engagement.
Quote:
edit: I suggest you set a character training for vagabonds et al on SiSi, the reason you have an inflated opinion of them is because you have never flown one, most likely.
already training for it. looking forward to flying the vaga.
|
| |
|